Legal Opinion

Cohen v. East Coast Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Kleinfeld, J.

In this action, brought by an injured party, for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties arising out of a disclaimer, the principal issue is whether the insurer has established that it exercised diligence and good faith in attempting to locate the assured and obtain her co-operation.

*814Plaintiff was injured, allegedly because of the assured’s negligence, on June 1, 1965. The insurer received notice, from the assured, on June 14, 1965, and set up a file. Insurer’s counsel testified, rather vaguely, that the matter ‘ ‘ was assigned ’ ’, and that1 ‘ The next thing that happened here was on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Citizens Casualty Co. v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Zappia v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Clark v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Axa Marine And Aviation Insurance (Uk) Limited v. Seajet Industries Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Leventhal v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of FloridaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. AXA Marine & Aviation Insurance (UK) Ltd. v. Seajet Industries Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API