Legal Opinion
Albert Lorenz v. Charles W. Finkl
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 25, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7125PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to the junior party Finkl1 in Interference No. 91,281 on the sole basis that the other application in the interference, serial No. 750,167, filed! July 22, 1958 by the senior party Lorenz,, is an abandoned application.
The record reveals that all the claims-of the Lorenz application numbered 1 through 6 were finally rejected solely on art by the examiner on June 19, 1959.2 The end of the six month statutory period for response fell on December 19, 1959, and this being a Saturday,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bain v. HasselstromCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Albert Lorenz v. Charles W. FinklCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964