Johnson v. Pomeroy
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the denial of extended workers’ compensation disability benefits to Richard Johnson based on his spouse’s income im-permissibly interferes with the Johnsons’ exercise of their constitutional rights to associate with one’s family and to marry. The district court held that the consideration of spousal income has only an incidental burden on the Johnsons’ marital relationship and did not constitute a violation of their constitutional rights. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM.
I.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.