Legal Opinion

Oliver v. HAYES INTERN. CORP.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 11, 1984No. Civ. 4152PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff (Hayes International Corporation) sued the defendant (Angus Oliver) for money paid by mistake. The defendant counterclaimed. The trial court, after both parties rested, granted plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict and entered a judgment for $7,429.40.

The defendant, through able counsel, appeals, contending the trial court erred in excluding (by a motion in limine) evidence on his counterclaims and in granting plaintiff's motion for directed verdict, thereby rejecting defendant's estoppel, laches, mutuality, and waiver defenses.

We find no error requiring reversal and affirm.

T…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mazer v. Jackson Ins. AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Brown-Marx Associates, Ltd. And Gary E. Smith v. Emigrant Savings Bank and Prudential Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Sherrill v. FRANK MORRIS, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ross v. Rosen-RagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Leasing Service Corp. v. Hobbs Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Ware v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 1100822 (Ala. 6-17-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. G. UB. MK. Constructors v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API