Legal Opinion

Dart v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1911No. 5956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court — Horn Samuel L. Carpenter, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff below, and defendants in error defendants below. It is sought to charge the defendants, personally, as officers and directors óf a corporation, with certain corporate debts, because of the failure to file, or cause to be filed, annual reports, as required by statute.

Suit was begun September 28, 1904. The complaint counts upon seven separate causes of action. The first is plaintiff’s own, for work done and services rendered, between the second day of November, 1903, and March 31st next following. The other six causes of action are assigned ones, and are for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. District of Columbia v. Camden Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. State Savings Bank v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Bliss v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Price v. Kit Carson CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Perini v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Price v. Kit Carson CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Wingett v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API