Legal Opinion

Chenault v. Honaker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1924No. 2291PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This suit was brought by appellant, Honaker, against L. S. Williams and Chenault & Wheat, a partnership composed of N. B. Chenault, W. L. Chenault, J. O. Wheat, and E/ O. Wheat, on a promissory note executed by Williams and Chenault & Wheat, the partnership acting by E. O. Wheat in the execution of the note. The defendants W. L. and N. B. Chenault pleaded that the note was not executed for the benefit of the partnership, that its execution was not within the scope of the- partnership business, and that it was executed for the individual benefit of E. O. Wheat, or as accommodation to L. S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moreland v. AtchisonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Fifth National Bank v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Stanton v. Security Bank & Trust Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Meyer, Bannerman & Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clonts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Tsesmelis v. Sinton State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Burleson v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Natkin Engineering Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Manes v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API