Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Romans
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Fifth District in an appeal from Hunt County. Romans sued the railway company and recovered judgment. It was affirmed on appeal by defendant, who thereupon obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
The defendant in error recovered the judgment from which this writ of error is prosecuted for damages for a personal injury received by him in the service of the plaintiff in error. The facts .upon which his right of recovery depends are thus stated by the Court of Civil Appeals:
“Plaintiff at the time of the injury was in the employ of defendant, loading cars with gumbo at a plant owned and eontroHed by defendant. At said plant there were three large embankments of burnt gumbo in parallel rows several hundred yards in length probably one hundred feet wide and twelve to fifteen feet high.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Simmons v. Terrell Electric Light Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Gibson v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Sternenberg v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Texas & N. O. R. v. SarverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.