Legal Opinion

Cullen v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1982No. 82-124Published

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

The instant case is another in a series of cases appealed to this court by reason of our decision in Novotny v. City of Omaha, 207 Neb. 535, 299 N.W.2d 757 (1980). The decision in this case, however, is controlled by our subsequent decisions in Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 372, 318 N.W.2d 742 (1982), and Teague v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 872, 320 N.W.2d 779 (1982), wherein we held that the City of Omaha was not estopped from asserting the defense that the statute of limitations had run and the action was therefore barred.

On the basis of the Kohlbeck and Teague decisions, the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kohlbeck v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Novotny v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Teague v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API