Legal Opinion

London Lancashire Fire Ins. Co. v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1909No. 527PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from, District Court, Pontotoc County; A. T. West, Fried Judge. Action by C. C. Cummings and others against the London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. This( action was brought in the trial court by defendants in error against plaintiff in error to recover upon a fire insurance policy.

Read the full summary

Error from, District Court, Pontotoc County; A. T. West, Fried Judge. Action by C. C. Cummings and others against the London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. This( action was brought in the trial court by defendants in error against plaintiff in error to recover upon a fire insurance policy. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendants in error on the 4th day of May, .1908. On the 8th day of May, 1908, motion for a new trial was overruled, and plaintiff in error was given 60 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. On the 22d day…

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

(after stating the facts as above). It clearly appears that the order extending the time within which to prepare and serve the case-made was not granted until after the expiration of the time allowed by the court in which to prepare and serve the same. It is well settled that neither the court nor the judge thereof in vacation after the time granted in which to prepare and serve a case-made has expired has the power to extend the time previously granted by the court in which to make and serve a ease-made. Abel v. Blair, 3 Okla. 399, 41 Pac. 342; United States v. C., O. & G. Ry. Co. et al., 3…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Abel v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Blanchard v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Board of Comrs. Day Co. v. HubbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carr v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Cowan v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Haynes v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Ellis v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. First Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API