Legal Opinion

Cearley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 8, 2014No. 14-382TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jurisdictional Requirements for a Tax Refund Suit; Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Money-Mandating Source; Prison Litigation Reform Act

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

This case is one of three complaints that pro se plaintiff Jackie Ray Cearley filed in this Court in 2014. In the present case, Mr. Cearley requests $20,024 as a tax refund and $10,000 for the Government’s, alleged violations of certain laws and executive orders. Pl.’s Compl. at 6, Dkt. No. 1. The Government moved to dismiss Mr. Cearle/s complaint for failure to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Jefferson County v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duffy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Beatty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Anoruo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Wentland v. DoeDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API