Montana Department of Revenue v. Priceline.Com, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice McKINNON
¶27 I concur with the Court’s conclusion that the OTCs are not responsible for collecting and remitting taxes under the Lodging Facility Use Tax, §§ 15-65-101 through 131, MCA, because they are not “owners” or “operators” of the “facility” as required by the statute. However, the statutory language of the Sales Tax, §§ 15-68-101 through 820, MCA, is ambiguous as to whether an OTC performs a “service for consideration,” and reference to legislative history is therefore required. Because the legislative history clearly establishes that OTCs were not intended to be part of the tax base, I would…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Adair v. SchnackMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Christenot v. State, Dept. of CommerceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Schuman v. BestromMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Marsh v. OverlandMontana Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.