Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Montana Department of Revenue v. Priceline.Com, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2015No. DA 14-0260Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice McKINNON

¶27 I concur with the Court’s conclusion that the OTCs are not responsible for collecting and remitting taxes under the Lodging Facility Use Tax, §§ 15-65-101 through 131, MCA, because they are not “owners” or “operators” of the “facility” as required by the statute. However, the statutory language of the Sales Tax, §§ 15-68-101 through 820, MCA, is ambiguous as to whether an OTC performs a “service for consideration,” and reference to legislative history is therefore required. Because the legislative history clearly establishes that OTCs were not intended to be part of the tax base, I would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Adair v. SchnackMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Christenot v. State, Dept. of CommerceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Schuman v. BestromMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Marsh v. OverlandMontana Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API