Legal Opinion

Mackintosh v. Houghton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The denial of the plaintiff’s motion to recommit the master’s report shows no reversible error. Ball v. Allen, 216 Mass. 469. Smith v. Lloyd, 224 Mass. 173.

The evidence not having been reported the plaintiff’s exceptions founded on the master’s findings or on his refusal to make findings as requested cannot be reviewed. Warfield v. Adams, 215 Mass. 506. The exceptions to the failure of the master to make rulings of law as requested also are of no avail. The report makes no reference to such requests for rulings or any action thereon. Cook v. Scheffreen, 215 Mass. 444. Ball v. Allen, 216 Mass.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Warfield v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Smith v. LloydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Ball v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Cole v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. HarrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Goodman v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Storer v. CogganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API