Legal Opinion

Pyron v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 30, 1942No. 29378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) TJ. S. C. A. title 29, § 206, headed “Minimum wages; effective date," pro vides: “(a) Every employer shall pay to each of his employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce wages at the following rates, . .” and fixes, as wages, minimum rates which are to be paid employees and which are to become effective on certain dates. § 207 is headed, “Maximum hours" and provides: “(a) No employer shall, except as otherwise provided in this section, employ any of his employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kitchens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Elkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orange Crush Bottling Company v. TuggleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  2. Yearty v. General Wholesale Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Lee v. Southern Airways IncorporatedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Lee v. Southern Airways IncorporatedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Reese v. AltermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API