Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Wooten Construction Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1989No. 11530PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

Claimant appeals the hearing officer’s disposition order in a workers’ compensation case that found him only temporarily totally disabled. The disposition order was filed April 12, 1989. Claimant’s notice of appeal was filed pro se with the Workers’ Compensation Division (Division) on May 10, within thirty days of the filing of the disposition order. The notice of appeal was not timely filed with this court and the time to obtain an extension of time to file the notice of appeal with the court of appeals has expired. See SCRA 1986, 12-201 and 12-601. Due to claimant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Weeks v. Chief of Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Chavez-Rey v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. James v. BrumlopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Collins v. Boulder Urban Renewal AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lowe v. BloomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schultz v. POJOAQUE TRIBAL POLICE DEPT.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Singer v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Lowe v. BloomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Maples v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API