Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New Rochelle City Court

Decided February 3, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham Breitbart, J.

On this preliminary hearing the court finds that corroborative evidence of the kind required by section 2013 of the Penal Law has not been presented by the People in support of a charge of rape, first degree, against the defendant. However, the overriding question to be determined is whether the “ other ” supporting evidence delineated by the statute need be present in order to hold the defendant for the action of the Grand Jury.

The parties are aware that the fundamental principle to be observed on a preliminary hearing is that the ‘ ‘ committing magistrate is not required to exact the full…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. NitzbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. People v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. People v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. People v. TerwilligerNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. RomanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SpencerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1971
  2. People v. MartinezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. People v. ScarposiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
  4. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API