Legal Opinion

People v. Romano

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.

The appellant stands convicted of rape in the first degree. It was claimed by the People that the prosecutrix had been criminally defiled on a single occasion by each of a group of men. Whether the appellant was one of the perpetrators was in his case the major issue. The prosecutrix identified him as one of her assailants and swore he had raped her when her powers of resistance had been beaten down in an effort to repulse the others.(1) This testimony needed the support of other evidence (Penal Law, § 2013) which, we think, was lacking. A codefendant was the only witness relied on to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. People v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. People v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Bennett v. Crescent Athletic-Hamilton ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Matter of Roge v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. People v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. People v. WallensNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API