Legal Opinion

D'Amico v. City of Strongsville

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2003No. 01-3901Published

1Per curiam

Mario D’Amico appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Strongsville. He claims violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and his right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arising from a failure of the City of Strongsville to promote him within the Strongsville Fire Department. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

In November of 1998, the City of Strongsville notified its Civil Service Corn-*676mission that it wanted to promote three people within the fire department to new captain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Joseph Paskvan v. City of Cleveland Civil Service Commission Mitchel J. Brown Howard E. Rudolph and George v. Voinovich, Mayor, City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API