State v. Lehman
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Troy Lehman appeals from a criminal judgment and commitment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of kidnapping and terrorizing. We affirm, concluding sufficient evidence exists to support the kidnapping conviction, the jury instructions adequately informed the jury of the law, and the verdicts are not legally inconsistent.
I
[¶ 2] Troy Lehman was charged with kidnapping, attempt to commit theft by deception, and terrorizing. A jury trial was held on September 22 through 24, 2009.
[¶ 3] The facts of this case are disputed. According to testimony presented at trial,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Lehman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. AuneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Fonder v. FonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.