Legal Opinion

Caywood v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1965No. 43,923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The question in this case is whether defendant county is immune from liability for its alleged negligence in the operation of a recreational area owned and maintained by it.

Summarized quite briefly, the petition, in its first cause of action, alleged the following:

For some years, pursuant to statutory authority, the county owned, maintained and operated the Lake Afton recreational area. A dock had been extended out into the lake and a pump installed on it by means of which water was pumped and furnished to the owner of adjacent property. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Noel Ex Rel. Noel v. Menninger FoundationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Eikenberry v. Township of BazaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Krantz v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Carroll v. KittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. McCoy v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API