Legal Opinion

Borne v. City of Garland

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 18, 1986No. 05-85-00947-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLUNG, Justice.

Appellant, Borne, appeals a summary judgment in favor of the City of Garland in a suit for personal injuries brought against the City by Borne. For the reason set out below, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court.

Borne alleges that he was injured by electric shock when he came into contact with an underground power cable belonging to Garland Power and Light, a department of the City of Garland.

Garland is a home rule city existing under article XI, section 5 of the Texas Constitution and, as such, has full power of local self-government, subject to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. City of San Antonio v. SchautteetTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Houston v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Artco-Bell Corp. v. City of TempleTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fitts v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. BOARD OF TRUS., CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. City of Krum v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Borne v. City of Garland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Judy Hitchcock v. Board of Trustees, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. Sheree Freeman and Phillip Freeman v. City of Waxahachie, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API