Reid v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, Justice.
Defendants Clarence Reid and Nathaniel Mosely appeal from the overruling of their amended motions for new trial following a joint trial, verdicts of guilty of armed robbery and sentences to life imprisonment. Through appointed counsel, appellants have enumerated as error the general grounds and the admission of a photograph.
Appellants, pro se, have filed a motion pointing out that their counsel have not enumerated as error for review by this court two special grounds of their amended motion for new trial. On this basis, appellants contend that they are being ineffectively…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Yancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- McClendon v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Thornton v. AultSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Van Alstine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Austin v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.