Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Mannix

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2003No. 02CA1809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAILEY.

In this action to have easements declared invalid, defendants, Robert D. Mannix and Frances K. Mannix, appeal from the trial court's judgment quieting title in plaintiffs, Richard Stevens, M.T. Notestine, Karen J. Notestine, T.D. Notestine, and R.T. Notes-tine. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The case concerns real property referred to as sites 16, 17, and 18. Condominium complexes exist on portions of sites 16 and 18. Defendants own a condominium unit on site 18; plaintiffs own undeveloped property on sites 17 and 18.

The property is subject to several…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Cheever v. GravesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Loumar Development Co. v. RedelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Isenberg v. WoitchekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bolinger v. NealColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. City of Lakewood v. ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Crystal v. MarroneColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Gold Hill Development Co., L.P. v. TSG Ski & Golf, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Metzler v. BallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API