Metrovich v. Jovovich
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Morrison, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Morrison, C. J. :
The plaintiff brought an action in the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, against one Marovich, for the recovery of the sum of seven hundred and seventy-five dollars, alleged to be due on a contract for the direct payment of money, and procured a writ of attachment to be issued in said action. The writ was duly levied on certain property of the defendant in the action, and to procure the discharge of the attached property, the defendants in this action executed and delivered an undertaking, conditioned as follows: “Now, therefore, we, the undersigned, residents,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Rosenthal v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Riverside Portland Cement Co. v. TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Chapline v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.