Keeney Construction v. James Talcott Construction Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 Keeney Construction filed a complaint against James Talcott Construction Company, Inc. (Talcott), for delay, disruption and extra work. Keeney filed an Amended Complaint seeking similar damages against the project owner, the University of Montana (the “UM”), and against Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco) under Safeco’s surety bond issued to Talcott. The Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, granted partial summary judgment in favor of Talcott and Safeco on all of Keeney’s delay, disruption and interference claims that Keeney based on an allegation that it had an early completion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Carelli v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Morning Star Enterprises, Inc. v. R. H. Grover, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hajenga v. SchweinMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- King Resources, Inc. v. OliverMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Zirkelbach Construction, Inc. v. DOWL, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2017