Legal Opinion

Blanchar v. City of Casper

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1936No. 1251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs below, appellants here, • own street improvement bonds, issued in 1921, of a face value of over $80,000, which are *453due and unpaid. The statutes authorized the levy of assessments on land specially, benefited and the issuance of bonds to pay for the improvement, such bonds however to “be payable out of the local improvement fund created for the payment of the cost and expense of such improvement, and not otherwise.” Sections 2 and 46, c. 120, Wyo.Sess.Laws 1915.1 *3Plaintiffs’ bonds provide they are “payable only out of the local improvement fund created for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  4. State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Summerfield v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wootten v. WoottenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Gray v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Weeks v. Denver Tramway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of BurbankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  5. Gray v. City of Santa FéDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API