Joseph v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Burnett
I agree petitioner knowingly and voluntarily entered a guilty plea to murder and the murder indictment was sufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction. I disagree grand larceny is not a lesser included offense of armed robbery. In my opinion, grand larceny is a lesser included offense of armed robbery and, therefore, the trial judge had subject matter jurisdiction to accept petitioner’s guilty plea to grand larceny. Accordingly, I would reverse the post-conviction relief (PCR) judge’s order.
The circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to convict a defendant of an offense if 1) there…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. PrimusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. ScipioSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.