McDowell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
McDowell, doing business as McDowell Motor Company, owned an automobile which, in January, 1921, was lawfully in possession of one Stuper under a valid contract of conditional sale. Stuper used the automobile to transport whisky upon which the internal revenue tax had not been paid. Seizure followed, and McDowell intervened as a vendor who reserved title to the machine until final payment. The District Court ordered the automobile forfeited and sold. McDowell sued out writ of error.
The question argued was whether section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352) was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Farley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. One Haynes AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. One Packard Motor TruckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- States v. ManganoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Mellet & Nichter Brewing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
- Midland Motor Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society, Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
- United States v. One Buick Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
- United States v. One Ford AutomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.