Legal Opinion
Ball v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 8, 1944No. 2963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
On Motion of Paramount Pictures, Inc., to Dismiss Complaint as to it for Lack of Jurisdiction as to That Company.
On October 24, 1944, defendant Paramount Pictures, Inc., filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, or in lieu thereof, to quash the service of summons on that company on the ground: (1) that defendant is a New York corporation, and has neither an agent nor transacts business in Pennsylvania ; and (2) that defendant has not properly been served with process in this action.
This defendant entered a general appearance by his counsel on April 21, 1944; and on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. GittoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Dehne v. Hillman Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Red Star Yeast & Products Co. v. La BuddeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steinberg v. American Bantam Car Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- F.W. Kerr Chemical Company v. Crandall Associate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Lipp v. National Screen Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Simpson v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIADistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958