Legal Opinion

Paul David Carr v. Cueva, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 2, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01680Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-1680 DJC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CUEVA, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

18 without a lawyer. The court previously screened plaintiff’s original and second amended 19 complaints and found plaintiff had stated some claims but not others. ECF Nos. 12, 34. Each 20 time plaintiff was given the option to proceed on his cognizable claims or amend,

id.,

and each 21 time he chose to amend.…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API