Uhl v. Weiden
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by David E. Uhl against Hubert Weiden and others to remove a cloud from title, and to correct a description in a deed. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
On July 16, 1898, the complainant had a contract for the purchase of certain lots in Grand Rapids from the Kent County Savings Bank, and had employed one Herrington, a real-estate dealer of that city, to negotiate sales of the same. Henderson and wife owned some lots, upon which they resided, and Herrington negotiated a trade between them and the complainant, Uhl, who accepted a proposition to trade some of his lots for the Henderson property, and authorized Herrington to make the trade. He caused the Kent County Bank to make a deed to him, and he executed a deed to the Hendersons. He…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Connolly v. KeatingMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. DarrTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- In the Matter of Federal's Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Matsushita Electric Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Soo Sand & Gravel Co. v. M. Sullivan Dredging Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1921