Legal Opinion
Hanna v. Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 8, 2008No. 07-1090PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
Captain Mary Hanna sought discharge from the Army as a conscientious objector. *6The Department of the Army Conscientious Objector Review Board (“DACORB”) denied Hanna’s application. Hanna then petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus which the court granted, holding that there was no basis in fact for the DACORB’s decision. Hanna v. Sec’y of the U.S. Army, 2006 WL 2925268 (D.Mass. Oct.6, 2006). The Army appealed. We hold that the DACORB’s decision was without a basis in fact, and we therefore affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Mary Hanna joined the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kanai v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Watson v. GerenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- KANAI v. GerenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Gonzalez v. Elko County Public Defender's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Hanna v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.