Holstein v. QUALITY EXCELSIOR COAL COMPANY
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtG-eorge Bose Smith, J.
This claim by the appellant, Benlah Holstein, for benefits under the compensation law is based on the theory that silicosis was a contributing cause of her husband’s death. The commission’s denial of the claim was affirmed by the circuit court. The only question presented here is whether there is substantial competent evidence to support the commission’s decision.
Charles W. Holstein was a coal miner for many years and was last employed in that capacity by the appellee, from November, 1948, to May, 1952. It is now evident that Holstein was afflicted with silicosis when he left the appellee’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Biddle v. RileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. FodreaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barksdale Lumber Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Nash v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Davis v. Ark. Best Freight SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Davis v. C & M Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Tri State Insurance v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.