Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Hudspeth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1962No. Civ. 20696PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment holding valid the marriage of the parties.

Question Presented

Does the absence of witnesses invalidate a Nevada marriage ?

Record

Plaintiff filed an action in declaratory relief to determine the validity of her Nevada marriage. Defendant defaulted. The trial court declared the marriage valid. Plaintiff appealed. No appearance has been made on behalf of defendant.

Marriage Valid

Section 63, Civil Code, provides that marriages contracted without the state are valid in California if they would be valid by the law of the state in which they were contracted.

Section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Norman v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Estate of AbateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Vaughn v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Barrons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell L. Lafon, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Russell L. LaFon, Jr. v. Jacqueline Marie FelmleeSupreme Court of Delaware · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API