Legal Opinion

Hollister v. Donahoe

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Minnehaha county. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Mandamus by F. H. Hollister against Den Donahoe, as sheriff. From a judgment for damages in favor of plaintiff, plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, P. J.

This special proceeding was instituted to compel the issuing of a sheriff’s deed, refused on the ground that the period of redemption had not expired. On appeal to this court, it was determined that the plaintiff was entitled to a deed on June 22, 1897. Hollister v. Donahoe, 11 S. D. 497, 78 N. W. 959. The cause having been remanded on October 17, 1899, the plaintiff, by leave of court, filed supplemental allegations alleging damages, which were answered by defendant. On November 20th the plaintiff’s application to have his damages determined by the court or a referee was denied. On November…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollister v. DonahoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Dakota Building Authority v. Geiger-Berger Associates, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gardner v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Weller v. PlattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. South Dakota Building Authority v. Geiger-Berger Associates, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API