Bird v. New York State Thruway Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGoldman, J.
This appeal presents the question of the lent-employee doctrine as applied to workmen’s compensation. The question is raised under somewhat novel circumstances. The action was brought by Paul H. Bird, the claimant, against defendant New York State Thruway Authority (hereinafter referred to as Thruway) in the Court of Claims.
For nine years prior to the accident which gives rise to this appeal claimant had been a senior engineer geologist in the Bureau of Soil Mechanics, Department of Public Works, State of New York. His position placed him in the competitive class of the civil service. By a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Irwin v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pantess v. Saratoga Springs AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hill v. Erdle Perforating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Mancuso v. New York State Thruway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mancuso v. New York State Thruway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- O'Brien v. Garden Way Manufacturing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.