Hill v. Erdle Perforating Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion made at the close of the evidence for dismissal of the complaint and, instead, submitting the case to the jury. The jury found that plaintiff was not an employee of defendant at the time of his injury and so was not restricted to recovery under Workmen’s Compensation Law, and was entitled to a verdict in this negligence action against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when his hand was caught in one of defendant’s steel roller machines which he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ramsey v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Stone v. Bigley Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cameli v. Pace UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- O'Brien v. Garden Way Manufacturing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Cervantes v. Drayton Foods, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Cook v. City of GenevaNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Scott v. Altmar, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.