Legal Opinion

Rumely Products Co. v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1915No. 5434PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hamilton. County; J. H. Arnold, Judge. Action by T. H. Moss against the Rumely Products Co. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.

Appellee brought this suit against appellant for damages on account of false representations alleged to have been made by appellant in negotiating a sale of a thresher purchased by appellee for the purpose of threshing and preparing for market a crop of peas. In his petition the plaintiff alleged, in substance, that the defendant, at the time of the purchase of the machinery,, had notice of the fact that the plaintiff was buying it for the purpose of threshing a crop of peas to be grown for the market upon 55 acres of land. It was alleged that the plaintiff believed and reíied upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. International & Great Northern Railroad v. PapeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Blythe v. SpeaksTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Calvit v. McFaddenTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Williams v. BartowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DE KALB HYBRID SEED COMPANY v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Craftsman Glass, Inc. v. CatheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. El Jardin Immigration Co. v. KarlanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. W. Oil Fields Corporation v. NowlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API