Legal Opinion

Smith v. ASARCO Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This is an appeal by an employer from an award of worker’s compensation benefits to *947an employee found to be totally and permanently disabled as the result of silicosis.

There is no question but that appellee now has silicosis and is permanently disabled to some degree. Neither is there any question but that the silicosis is the result of appellee working underground in the zinc mines from 1970 until his retirement on March 31, 1979. However, appellant insists there is no material evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that appellee was injuriously exposed to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Senators, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Adams v. American Zinc CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp. v. ReevesTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. BrittTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Consolidation Coal Co. v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Marshall v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Marshall v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API