Legal Opinion

3M Company v. Continental Diamond Tool Corp

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 2, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00274Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION 3M COMPANY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Cause No. 1:21-CV-274-HAB ) CONTINENTAL DIAMOND TOOL ) CORP., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER This motion is the second Rule 12 motion filed in this employment contract dispute. After succeeding in part on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion attacking Defendants’ initial counterclaim, Plaintiffs have now filed a Rule 12(c) attacking the amended counterclaim. The motion for judgment on the pleadings is now fully briefed (ECF Nos. 60, 64, 68) and is ripe for determination.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomason v. NachtriebCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. R.J.R. Services, Inc., Individually, and D/B/A Ron Russell and Associates, and Ronald J. Russell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Gatx Leasing Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. United Wild Rice, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API