3M Company v. Continental Diamond Tool Corp
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION 3M COMPANY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Cause No. 1:21-CV-274-HAB ) CONTINENTAL DIAMOND TOOL ) CORP., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER This motion is the second Rule 12 motion filed in this employment contract dispute. After succeeding in part on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion attacking Defendants’ initial counterclaim, Plaintiffs have now filed a Rule 12(c) attacking the amended counterclaim. The motion for judgment on the pleadings is now fully briefed (ECF Nos. 60, 64, 68) and is ripe for determination.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thomason v. NachtriebCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- R.J.R. Services, Inc., Individually, and D/B/A Ron Russell and Associates, and Ronald J. Russell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Gatx Leasing Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United Wild Rice, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.