Legal Opinion

Joyce v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 15, 1976No. 408 212, CA 4804; 408 306, CA 4803PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, P. J.

Plaintiffs, owners of land situated in the city of Portland, filed complaints seeking (1) declaratory judgments, (2) judicial review, and (3) in the alternative, damages, in response to a zone change affecting their property initiated by defendant city. The circuit court sustained defendants’ demurrers to plaintiffs’ alternative claims for damages on the grounds that they did not state sufficient facts to constitute causes of action, overruled defendants’ demurrers predicated upon misjoinder of actions, and treated the cases as before it upon writs of review. It then affirmed the validity of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Culver v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Baker Community Hotel Co. v. Hotel Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Local No. 161Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Multnomah County v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Neuberger v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Codorus Township v. RodgersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API