Acosta v. Target Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GERALDINE SOAT BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Being Withheld Under a Claim of Privilege. [Dkt. 128.]1 For the reasons set out below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part, and further relief is granted as set out herein.
BACKGROUND
The Amended Complaint
In their Amended Class Action Complaint, plaintiffs allege that Target (referring to Target Corporation and other related entities) violated various federal consumer protection laws, including the Truth in Lending Act, 15…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Memorial Hospital for McHenry County v. The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- RBS Citizens, N.A. v. HusainDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Deere v. American Water Works Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- Bankdirect Capital Finance, LLC v. Capital Premium Financing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Breuder v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 502, DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.