Legal Opinion

Hultz v. Federated Mutual Insurance

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 11, 1993No. 91-3353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

This cause is before the Court on the recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Evans to dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs amended complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Section 636 allows any party to appeal from or object to a magistrate’s recommendation “[wjithin 10 days after being served with a copy.”

The Magistrate entered his recommendation on January 14, 1993. No objections or modifications have been filed since that time. Therefore, without objection to and upon consideration of the Magistrate’s findings and conclusions, the Court adopts in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd. And Joseph SclafaniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Alex Kush v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Barr Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Lynch v. Mid-America Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nuno v. County of San BernardinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
  2. Applied Micro, Inc. v. SJI Fulfillment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. Shandwick Holdings, Ltd. v. Carver Boat Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API