Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Schrimsher

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 3, 1991No. 89-1832PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a legal malpractice action. On May 14, 1990, Charles L. Pearce and his wife, Jolyn W. Pearce, filed a complaint in Madison Circuit Court against James B. Schrimsher, a practicing attorney in Huntsville, Alabama, alleging that they had incurred damages by closing a real estate transaction in reliance on an erroneous title opinion that had been provided to them by Schrimsher. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the Pearces' claim was barred by the statute of limitations set out in Ala. Code 1975, § 6-5-574 (part of the Alabama Legal Services Liability Act, Ala.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Childs v. MISSISSIPPI VAL. TITLE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. First Nat. Bank v. Gilbert Imported Hardwoods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Karagan v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Applin v. Consumers Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Mikkelsen v. SalamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. LEIGHTON AVE. OFFICE PLAZA v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Kachler v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  5. Wesson v. McCleave, Roberts, Shields & Green, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API