Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Railway Company v. David W. Hutchings, a Minor, by Next Friend, James H. Hutchings

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1961No. 14076Published

1DissentO’Sullivan, Circuit Judge

I regret my inability to concur in the opinion of my learned brothers. I am unable to find the fact, or facts, from which a jury could infer that the plaintiff was an “obstruction which appeared upon the road” within the meaning of Section 65-1208(4), Tennessee Code, Annotated.

Under Tennessee law, the burden was upon plaintiff to show that he, in fact, had become an obstruction ahead of the train at a time when his presence as such was, or could have been, observed by the crew of the train. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. R. Co. v. Brock, 132 Tenn. 477, 178 S.W. 1115; Meador v. Nashville, C. &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Meador v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Preslar v. Mobile & O. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Floyd Farmer, Administrator of the Estate of Donald Lewis Farmer, Deceased, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Willie Farmer, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Donald Farmer, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API