Legal Opinion

De Fulvio v. Holst

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, 721PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Van der Voort, J.,

Appeal is taken from the following Orders entered upon plaintiffs Motion following declaration of mistrial:

Order sur Motion to Seal Notes of Testimony

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 1975, after argument before the Court en Banc consisting of Frederick B. Smillie, J., A. Benjamin Scirica, J., and *68Joseph H. Stanziani, J., the Motion to Seal Notes of Testimony is allowed and the Notes of Testimony taken from September 15 through September 21, 1972 are hereby sealed and access denied until after trial.

By the Court,

/s/ Frederick B. Smillie, J.

Order sur Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Richmond v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Morganroth's Election Contest CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Walker v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Fife v. the Great A. & P. Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kelmo Enterprises, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Gold & Co. v. Northeast Theater Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Kearns v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bethards v. Shivvers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API