Legal Opinion
Osher v. JNI CORP.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 10, 2004No. 01 CV 557 J(NLS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE [Doc. No. 126](2) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT [Doc. No. 124]
JONES, District Judge.
By order dated August 25, 2003, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Consolidated Complaint (“SACC”) without prejudice and with leave to amend. On October 31, 2003, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Consolidated Complaint (“TACC”). Defendants have now moved to dismiss the TACC. (Doc. No. 124.) The Court finds this matter suitable for decision on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grosset v. WenaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Immune Response Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Discover Bank v. VadenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007