State v. Roberts
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of the crime of taking indecent liberties with and upon the person of a 10-year-old girl.
We do not find it necessary to set forth the facts. Error is not assigned to the sufficiency of the evidence.
Trial Counsel — Effectiveness and Competence
Defendant argues that he “was denied effective assistance of counsel contrary to” his constitutional rights. We have recognized that no conviction can stand, no matter how overwhelming the evidence of guilt, if the accused is denied the effective assistance of counsel.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. BoggsWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. KosankeWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Theodore Way v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Dekelt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. KolocotronisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- District of Columbia v. WaltersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.