Fierman v. Seward Nat. Bank of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the
facts as above). It is elementary that the Pennsylvania bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to collect and distribute the estate of the Pennsylvania bankrupt, the Hardwood Company. When the bankrupt’s property was sold free of liens, the liens upon the property became rights against the substituted proceeds of sale, and claimants to this fund were obliged to assert their rights by applying to the court in whose custody it was. See In re Rochford, 124 F. 182 (C. C. A. 8); In re Kohl-Hepp Brick Co., 176 F. 340 (C. C. A. 2); Murphy v. John Hofman Co., 211 U. S. 562, 29 S. Ct.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- In re RochfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- United States Trust Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- In re Kohl-Hepp Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- In re Valecia Condensed Milk Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Matter of Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- In Re MacARTHUR COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Rubenstein v. NourseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Francis M. Marley v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.