Legal Opinion
BERGEN CTY. ASSOC. v. Borough of East Rutherford
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 19, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
265 N.J. Super. 1 (1993)
625 A.2d 524
BERGEN COUNTY ASSOCIATES, C/O JAMES WHEAT, LIQUIDATOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 17, 1993.
Decided May 19, 1993.
Before Judges KING, LANDAU and THOMAS.
Kenneth A. Porro argued the cause for appellant (Porro and Porro, attorneys; Joan Atkins Porro, on the brief; Mr. Porro, on the reply brief).
Frank E. Ferruggia argued the cause for respondent (McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Ferruggia and Susan A. Feeney, on the brief).
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Inmar Associates, Inc. v. Borough of CarlstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- In Re: Custom Distribution Services Inc., Debtor City of Perth Amboy v. Custom Distribution Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Emmis Broadcasting Corp. of N.Y. v. East Rutherford BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1995
- City of Jersey City v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
- Mori v. Town of SecaucusNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
- Russo v. Borough of CarlstadtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.