Legal Opinion

Town of Laporte City v. Goodfellow

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Blade Hcnde District Gowrt. On the 23d day of August, 1876, there was filed before J. Wasson, Mayor of the town of Laporte City, a duly incorporated town in Black Hawk.county, an information, duly sworn to by one A. Cotton, as follows: “ The defendant is accused of the crime of misdemeanor, for that, on the 22d day of August, 1876, at the town of Laporte.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Blade Hcnde District Gowrt. On the 23d day of August, 1876, there was filed before J. Wasson, Mayor of the town of Laporte City, a duly incorporated town in Black Hawk.county, an information, duly sworn to by one A. Cotton, as follows: “ The defendant is accused of the crime of misdemeanor, for that, on the 22d day of August, 1876, at the town of Laporte. City, Black Hawk county, Iowa, he did willfully and wrongfully make use of loud, violent, profane and offensive language, to the disturbance and annoyance of tbe citizens of said town and against the peace and quiet of said town…

1Opinion of the Court

Day, Ch. J.:The only question presented by the argument of appellant is whether it is necessary that the information i pbuadmtg: should refer to the ordinance alleged to have been dioiai notice' violated by its title and the date of its passage. Section 506 of the Code of 1873 provides: “The mayor of each city or incorporated town shall be a magistrate and conservator of the peace, and within the same have the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace in all matters civil or criminal arising under the laws of the State or the ordinances of said city or *574town, and the rules of law regulating…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conboy v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Portland v. YickOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Mayhew v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Keck v. City of Cincinnati, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1896
  5. Strauss v. Village of ConneautAshtabula Circuit Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API